|
|
Post by Danny Vice on Aug 5, 2007 13:19:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Talan Trenor on Aug 5, 2007 13:46:36 GMT -5
Uh, isnt it way to early to even have a hall of fame?
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael "Thunder" Knight on Aug 5, 2007 14:13:09 GMT -5
I don't think so.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe Ragnal/Chrysta on Aug 5, 2007 14:43:40 GMT -5
I agree with Thunder. Despite the fact we've only been around for a year, I think it's deserving we look at the roster that helped bring GWC to fruition.
Hell, I know feds who do it annually and are still less than two years old.
|
|
|
|
Post by "Reckless Jack" Brad Kane on Aug 5, 2007 17:44:21 GMT -5
I was part of a fed that was open three months when it started a HoF.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bobby Cairo on Aug 5, 2007 19:44:58 GMT -5
Can I safely presume that a certain someone will be the inaugural inductee?
|
|
|
|
Post by Creeping Death on Aug 5, 2007 20:15:05 GMT -5
... sounds silly, honestly.
Took WCF like 4 years.
|
|
The Emperor
Ultimate Champion 
The Hardcore Emperor
Posts: 347
|
Post by The Emperor on Aug 5, 2007 20:38:23 GMT -5
I think it's a good idea for the Coalition to have the Hall of Fame, heck, I hope that I would be inducted into the HoF!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ryder on Aug 15, 2007 14:58:15 GMT -5
It should only happen if the guys (or girls) going in made some kind of profound impact on the company back in the beginning. No offense to the new guys, but it would be kind of silly to have someone too new inducted already. I also think it should probably be people who are no longer with the GWC. Anybody agree with me or am I just spouting off at the mouth again?  |
|
|
|
Post by Danny Vice on Aug 15, 2007 15:05:47 GMT -5
Three inductees. I already decided who they are.
|
|
